The management’s responsibility for the annual
financial statements
The management is responsible for the preparation of annual
financial statements that present a true and fair view, in accord-
ance with the Financial Activities Act and the additional disclo-
sure requirements for listed financial companies in Denmark.
The management is also responsible for the internal control
deemed necessary by the management in order to prepare an-
nual financial statements that are free of material misstatement,
whether this is due to fraud or error.
On the preparation of the annual financial statements, the man-
agement is responsible for assessing the Bank’s ability to con-
tinue as a going concern, for disclosing information concerning
continuation as a going concern, where relevant, and for apply-
ing the going concern basis of accounting, unless the manage-
ment intends to either liquidate the Bank, discontinue opera-
tions, or has no other realistic alternative to this.
Auditor’s responsibility for the audit of the annual
financial statements
Our objective is to obtain reasonable assurance of whether the
financial statements as a whole are free from material misstate-
ment, whether this is due to fraud or error, and to issue an au-
ditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance
is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit
conducted in accordance with international auditing standards
and additional requirements applicable in Denmark will always
detect a significant material misstatement when it exists. Mis-
statements can arise from fraud or error and are considered
material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasona-
bly be expected to influence the economic decisions of users
taken on the basis of the annual financial statements.
As part of an audit in accordance with international auditing
standards and additional requirements replicable in Denmark,
we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional
scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
• Identify and assess the risk of material misstatement of the
annual financial statements, whether due to fraud or error,
design and perform audit procedures responsive to those
risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appro-
priate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not
detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is
higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may in-
volve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresen-
tations, or the overriding of internal control.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the
audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropri-
ate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Bank’s in-
ternal control.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of the accounting policies ap-
plied by the management, as well as the reasonableness of
accounting estimates and related information prepared by
the management.
• Draw conclusions concerning the appropriateness of the
management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting
and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a mate-
rial uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that
may cast significant doubt on the Bank’s ability to continue
as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncer-
tainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our audi-
tor’s report to the related disclosures in the annual financial
statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify
our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evi-
dence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report.
However, future events or conditions may cause the Bank
to cease to continue as a going concern.
• Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of
the annual financial statements, including the disclosures in
the Notes, and whether the annual financial statements rep-
resent the underlying transactions and events in a manner
that achieves fair presentation.
We communicate with the top-level management regarding,
among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the au-
dit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficien-
cies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We also provide those charged with government with a state-
ment that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements
regarding independence, and notify them of all relations and
other matters that might reasonably influence our independ-
ence and, where relevant, related safeguards put in place to and
measures taken to eliminate threats.
On the basis of the matters communicated to the top-level
management, we determine the matters of most significance to
the audit of the annual financial statements for the relevant pe-
riod and which are thereby key audit matters. We describe
these matters in our auditor’s report, unless disclosure of the
matter is prescribed by statutory or other regulation, or in the
very rare cases where we find that the matter is not to be
communicated in our auditor’s report because its negative con-
sequences might reasonably be expected to carry greater
weight than the advantages to the general public of such disclo-
sure.